At some point the gap between press conference and reality becomes too glaring to ignore…
By Maria Moser
How on earth could something as silly as neighborhood public schools bedevil Rahm Emanuel right out of his incumbent throne as mayor of Chicago? The New York Times recently asked that question, and I’m happy to provide some answers. My home is on Chicago’s South Side, on a street full of cops and firefighters, and people still call themselves *new to the neighborhood* if they’ve been here less than 25 years. With only 9 years under my belt, I’m a relative newcomer. But traveling often for work, and seeing the gap between national coverage and reality on the ground, I’d like to try to answer a question that’s been asked a lot recently: What happened to Rahm? Continue reading →
Who will be the next superintendent of the Boston Public Schools (and who really gets to decide???)
It’s a bird. No–it’s a plane. No–it’s actually snow. Why it’s snowing men, reader! Four men to be precise, each of whom longs to lead the Boston Public Schools. But first these *he’s* must make their way through a gauntlet of challenges: like using *innovation* three different ways in a sentence, putting the best spin possible on a veritable closet full of edu-skeletons, and engaging in a marathon’s worth of glad-handing with *stakeholders.* So who is to be our Super man? Full disclosure: I have no idea, but I suggest that we meet them quickly as a decision is imminent. Continue reading →
Xian Franzinger Barrett argues that accountability without equity means more inequity…
Chicago teacher Xian Barrett.
EduShyster: OK—I need you to set me straight here. Is ensuring that we continue to test kids in high-needs schools the civil rights issue of our time? Or is striking a blow against too much testing in high-needs schools the civil rights issue of our time? Or is civil rights actually the civil rights issue of our time?
Xian Franzinger Barrett: The people who are talking about this genuinely on both sides are talking about the same thing, it’s just that the problem they’re trying to address is pervasive and terrible. This idea that we’re unseen and unheard unless we’re measured has a basis in history and reality, so I think it’s important that we don’t lose that. But anyone who says *you’re not going to be acknowledged unless you’re tested* is either too pessimistic or they’re racist. We also have to acknowledge that the very fact that people aren’t being supported or treated equitably unless they’re measured is racism. No one would ever say: *the rich kids in this private school—we don’t have a good measurement of them so we’re just not going to give them an education.* That’s just ridiculous. Continue reading →
But do they love her for the right reasons?
Oh Lawrence, you city by the Spicket, you. It seems like only yesteryear that everyone who was anyone was writing the damndest things about your poorest-burg-in-Massachusetts self. And here you are – not just grown up, but blown up. The edupreneurial set suddenly can’t get enough of you. Your story is even bandied about across the pond. And who’s that I see checking you out from a few states over, Lawrence? Why if that isn’t New York looking you up and down… Continue reading →
Minnesota’s charter experiment comes up short, while elsewhere in the Gopher state a Loon rises…
By Sarah Lahm, EduShyster Academy
Gopher state hearts and minds are in a state of confusion these days, thanks to the simultaneous appearance of two head-spinning headlines. First came this stunning jolt to the system (the charter system, that is): It turns out that charter schools, even the ones in Minnesota (our license plates say *First in Charter Schools!*), may not be the magical, miraculous, free market answer to our public school problems we’ve been led to believe. Continue reading →